Structural Measurement Atlas
Atlas / Measurement types / Fault plane

Fault plane measurements

9,942 fault plane measurements from published US geologic maps, recorded as strike and dip and cited to the map each came from — 1% of the Atlas.

Show only fault plane on the map

What it is

A fault plane is the discrete surface a displacement happened on. The plane's strike and dip say how the fault is oriented; they do not say which way, or how far, the rock moved.

That distinction matters for anyone doing kinematic work. A fault plane on its own supports map-scale interpretation and little more. A fault plane paired with a slickenline measured on it is a fault-slip datum: plane, plus slip direction, plus — where the source recorded it — a sense of shear. That is the input to paleostress inversion and to fault-slip analysis generally.

The Atlas identifies those pairs where the published data supports it, nesting a lineation under the plane it was measured on rather than leaving the two as unrelated points on a map.

How the Atlas records it

Every fault plane row carries an azimuth and an inclination in one convention (right-hand-rule strike and dip), a position in WGS 84 with the publisher's own location confidence, the raw type term as the source published it, and the citation of the source map. Selections export as CSV with a companion sources.csv of citations.

Which sources have it

Where it is

StateMeasurementsShare
Washington 2,95830%
California 2,15222%
Arizona 7738%
Vermont 7508%
Texas 4835%
Alaska 4134%
Colorado 3754%
Montana 2843%
North Carolina 2212%
New Hampshire 2172%
Virginia 2062%
Maine 1802%
New Mexico 1802%
Idaho 1231%
Oregon 1191%
Pennsylvania 79<1%
New York 66<1%
South Dakota 65<1%
South Carolina 46<1%
Nevada 45<1%
New Jersey 37<1%
Utah 22<1%
Minnesota 12<1%
Wyoming 9<1%
Kentucky 8<1%
Georgia 6<1%
Massachusetts 4<1%
Arkansas 1<1%

Most-measured published maps

Published mapYearScaleMeasurements
Mavor and others (2023) — field observation (this release)2023 630
adapted from: R.M.P., N.G.J. and W.B.T. 1963. Karst Features Near Amistad Dam. International Boundary & Water Commission. 1:12,0002010 12000480
Merschat, A.J., Carter, M.W., Lynn, A.S., Weinmann, B.R., Odom, W.E., McAleer, R.J., Mahan, S.A., Stewart, K.G., Holm-Denoma, C.S., and Crider, E.A., Jr., 2026, Preliminary geologic map of the Sparta East, Sparta West, and parts of the Glade Valley and Whitehead 7.5-minute quadrangles, North Carolina and Virginia, and the epicentral area of the August 9, 2020, Mw 5.1 earthquake near Sparta, North Carolina: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2026–1010, 1 sheet, scale 1:24,000.2026 1:24,000371
Tectonic map of southeast Arizona2002 1:125,000311
adapted from: Kinkel, A.R., Hall, W.E., and Albers, J.P., 1956, Geology and Base-Metal Deposits of West Shasta Copper-Zinc District, Shasta County, California: U.S. Geological Survey, Professional Paper 285, plate 1, scale 1:24,0002025 24000258
OFR 97-2 1:24,000254
MS 2014-012014 1:24,000248
adapted from: Moore, J.G., 1981, Geologic Map of the Mount Whitney Quadrangle, Inyo And Tulare Counties, California: U.S. Geological Survey, Geologic Quadrangle Map GQ-1545, scale 1:62,5002022 62500206
ducfltpt 24000204
adapted from: Peck, D.L., 1980, Geologic Map of the Merced Peak Quadrangle, Central Sierra Nevada, California: U.S. Geological Survey, Geologic Quadrangle Map GQ-1531, scale 1:62,5002021 62500159
Preliminary geologic map of the eastern Willapa Hills, Cowlitz, Lewis, and Wahkiakum Counties, Washington2014 1:50,000157
MS 2012-012012 1:24,000141

Other measurement types